Massachusetts Article

Editorial: State Needs to Stay Out of Return to Rent Control Regulations

Editorial: State Needs to Stay Out of Return to Rent Control Regulations

The Boston Herald Editorial Board outlines why rent control is wrong for Massachusetts.

Imagine you’re a small business owner — which essentially is the case for many property owners — and government decides how much you can charge for services and products. Most of us would rather pay $4.99 for a juicy filet mignon. That’s not realistic, nor does it make sense. Restaurant owners forced to limit their prices based on a government calculus will soon be former restaurant owners.

Gov. Charlie Baker has said that rent control is a bad idea, and we agree. Government’s role in the high cost of housing is not to place restrictions on business owners, but this is typical of a lot of government thinking — to rant about a problem, then throw taxpayer money at it without actually devising a solution. If the government wants to address the high cost of housing, instead take that money and build public housing. That’s been happening for years.

In Cambridge, according to a report from the National Bureau of Economic Research, the end of rent control lifted the value of that city’s housing stock by $1.8 billion.

What happened next? Builders aren’t dumb: They got to building. There was money to be made.

That’s called the free market, and it works. The market decides. Many of us would love to live in a Back Bay brownstone, but can’t afford it. This isn’t complicated. 

Our recommendation: Do not expect a filet priced at $4.99, do not force businesses to pursue unprofitable investments, and do not let the State House artificially restrict the price of anything.

Read more here.


Join Our Email List

Managed by Immediate Bitwave

Managed by Immediate MSpark